In many ways, success should make relationships easier—more resources, more freedom, more choice. But what happens instead is that the variables shift: the stakes go up, the radius of interaction narrows, and the cost of vulnerability increases.

"Everybody wants something from me now, and I don't wanna let 'em down."¹

That's Billie Eilish at the height of her career—multiple Grammys, global fame, millions of fans—describing what success actually feels like. Not triumph, pressure. The weight of everyone's expectations, needs, and agendas.

At her 20th birthday party, she had a jarring realization. She told Rolling Stone magazine: "I looked around the room and every single person was an employee of mine. I was like, 'Oh, shit, I literally don't have friends. I don't have people that see me as an equal. I don't have people that aren't afraid of me.'"²

​

​

Shonda Rhimes—creator of Grey's Anatomy, Scandal, and Bridgerton—explained why she relocated from Los Angeles to Connecticut after nearly 30 years: "In LA, I can give everybody a job. Like it's not just that people knew who I was, but I'm a person who could hire an actor, an executive, a director. Like I could give anybody a job. So it felt like everybody knew who I was and wanted something. Not in a mean way, but you know what I mean."³

She described crying in a Costco parking lot after getting her membership card—"it's like the first time I was ever able to do anything that felt that normal." The weight of that statement: she had to leave the city where she'd built her career because she couldn't exist there as just a person. Every interaction carried the possibility of being asked for something.

This pattern repeats at the highest levels. A Fortune magazine article captured it perfectly: "The CEOs of Apple, Airbnb, and PepsiCo agree on one thing: life as a business leader is incredibly lonely."

In the article, Indra Nooyi, former CEO of PepsiCo, described the structural bind: "You can't talk to your friends because it's confidential stuff about the company. You can't talk to your board because they are your bosses. You can't talk to people who work for you because they work for you. And so it puts you in a fairly lonely position… And you have to be very careful who your outlet is because you never want them to use it against you at any point."⁴

This isn't about complaining. It's about understanding a problem that few people acknowledge: the higher you climb, the more isolated you become—not despite your success, but because of it.

You have more access to people than ever before, but fewer relationships where you can simply be yourself.

The variables haven't just shifted—they've inverted. What should be easier becomes structurally harder.

The Paradox of Arrival: Success Creates Isolation

1. The Shrinking Circle

As status increases, you lose what sociologists call "weak ties"—the casual friendships, the spontaneous encounters, the relationships without agenda.

What replaces them: mentors, advisors, employees, admirers, people who want something. Not peers. Not fellow travelers.

Your social world becomes transactional by default, even when you don't want it to be.

But there's another layer to the shrinking circle that's rarely discussed: the people who knew you before may not immediately adapt to who you've become.

Shonda Rhimes observed: "You will find that there are people in your life who are not ready for you to have a new definition of yourself. And they are not happy for you. And I think it's threatening to who they are."⁵

This is the double bind of achievement: New people see you as a resource. Old people resent your transformation. The circle shrinks from both directions.

A study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that higher-income individuals report having fewer people they can count on in an emergency—despite having larger professional networks.⁶ Additional research concluded that "more money, more problems" isn't just a saying; beyond a certain income threshold (around $75,000-$95,000 depending on region), additional wealth correlates with lower life satisfaction in certain domains, particularly relationship quality.⁷

Brian Chesky, CEO of Airbnb, described both the problem and a partial solution: "The more success you get, the more lonely you tend to get. And you've got to fight against the isolation. I think when people hear loneliness, [they] assume, oh, I need to have a partner, like a romantic partner. And that's only part of the problem, frankly. Some of the loneliest people in the world are married, so that's not a full solution. You need to have friends… and if you're a founder, I would recommend making friends with other founders because they'll make you realize you're not so crazy after all, that what you're experiencing is not a solitary experience."⁸

He's right that finding peers—other founders, other people at your level—helps. But it doesn't solve the deeper problem: the structural barriers that make forming any genuine connection harder as you succeed.

In short: you become rarer in the marketplace of connection—and rare equals harder to match.

2. The Performance Trap

Brené Brown's research on vulnerability reveals something crucial: people often experience what she calls "vulnerability hangovers"—the fear that showing authentic emotion or uncertainty will damage their reputation or position.⁹ This is even more heightened for those with public profiles or significant achievement, because now they have a brand to protect, and sometimes it’s not even a brand they chose for themselves.

Malala Yousafzai—Nobel Peace Prize laureate, and a global icon championing education for girls—shares: "I think the way we are received in media and especially now on social media like that exposure is just crazy. You know, people then have this fixed image of you and you also internalize it. So I just thought like the girl that I was recognized as being strong and brave at age 15 who survived the Taliban bullet, this is who I need to be for the rest of my life. I have to be brave and courageous...and I was actually really happy with myself that I didn't need therapy, that I had overcome all of these things so quickly. I was now on this mission and then I was enjoying my life and suddenly like something so small triggered the whole trauma."¹⁰

The world saw her as fearless. She saw herself as someone who could never show weakness—someone who had to perform invincibility even to herself. The pressure to live up to what was expected meant she couldn't be human. And when the armor finally cracked, she thought she had failed.

Billie Eilish described a similar dynamic in her Rolling Stone interview: "I used to be so obsessed with this mysteriousness, and I think that's 100 percent why I didn't make any friends, because I didn't want anyone to know me, because I wanted everyone to think of me as this mysterious, cool person. I loved the idea of people feeling that way, but then I thought, 'Oh, here I am sitting alone in my room, loving the feeling that everybody thinks I'm really cool, but I'm not actually getting anything out of that. I'm not enjoying anything in my life at all.'"

The armor that protects you professionally becomes the barrier that prevents intimacy. You learn to perform competence, even in private spaces. You learn to curate. You learn that admitting struggle feels like weakness, so you don't.

3. The Trust Deficit

Success changes the trust equation. When you have something people want—money, connections, status, influence—you start asking a question you never had to ask before: Do they like me, or what I can do for them?

Psychologist Dacher Keltner's research at UC Berkeley found that as people gain power and wealth, they become worse at accurately reading others' emotions and intentions.

In one study, researchers manipulated participants' sense of social status—making some feel higher on the social ladder and others lower. The results were striking: people made to feel lower class were better able to discern others' emotions, while those made to feel upper class showed worse empathic accuracy. This held true regardless of participants' actual socioeconomic status, suggesting that the mere experience of elevated status—even temporarily—impedes our ability to connect with others emotionally. ¹¹

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie—the Nigerian author whose novels and essays have made her one of the most celebrated writers of our time—described this with painful precision: "I think one of the things about being a public figure...it's difficult to gauge who wants to be your friend or who wants to be Chimamanda's friend. I think there's a difference...So there are times when I've met someone and I felt, oh, this person is genuine. For me, what really matters in people is that they're real. I just do not like people who perform or who are false. I can't stand it. Life is too short to be fake, right? But sometimes I make a mistake. Sometimes I think this person is real and then I realize, no, they're actually looking at me not as a person, but as an opportunity. And that's a terrible thing."¹²

That distinction—between someone who wants to know you versus someone who wants to know what you represent—becomes the central calculation of every new interaction.

You develop what we might call a "radius of trust" problem. The circle of people you can be unguarded with shrinks dramatically.

4. Time Poverty and Fragmented Attention

The logistics of success erode what most relationships rely on: consistent presence, incremental trust, new experiences together.

A Harvard Business School study of high-achieving professionals found they work an average of 62 hours per week, with 50% reporting they check emails in bed and 72% saying they're "always on."¹³ This isn't just about time scarcity—it's about fragmented attention.

Relationships, particularly in their formative stages, require what psychologist John Gottman calls "bids for connection"—small moments of reaching out that build intimacy incrementally.¹⁴ But when you're always working, always traveling, always "on," you miss those bids. Or you're too depleted to respond to them.

The result: parallel lives. You might be in the same room, the same city, the same relationship—but you're not actually together.

5. The Self-Reliance Trap

The traits that got you here—drive, independence, self-efficacy, resilience—become obstacles in relationships.

You're used to solving problems. Being in control. Managing outcomes. But relationships don't yield to that logic. You can't optimize another person. You can't A/B test intimacy. You can't "hustle" your way to vulnerability.

When you're used to making strategic choices based on data, frameworks, and projections, the inherent uncertainty and messiness of relationships feels uncomfortable. So you either avoid them entirely or approach them with a level of reservation that prevents genuine connection.

What This Looks Like in Practice

The Dating App Wasteland

The apps promise efficiency—swipe through hundreds of profiles, filter by preferences, "optimize" your search. But what actually happens:

• You match with people who seem impressive on paper but feel hollow in person
• You wonder if they're attracted to you or to what you represent
• You perform even in the getting-to-know-you phase, unsure how much to reveal
• You can't shake the feeling that everyone's auditioning, including you

The volume doesn't solve the problem. It amplifies it. Because the apps are built for scale, not depth. And your problem isn't access—it's discernment.

The Social Circle Dead-End

Your friends would love to help, but they're out of single friends to introduce you to. Or the introductions feel forced—someone's cousin’s colleague who "also works hard and is successful."

You've tried the networking events, the exclusive clubs, the industry conferences. But those spaces optimize for professional connection, not personal. Everyone's performing their professional identity. No one's being real.

The irony: you have access to impressive rooms, but you're lonelier in them than you were before success.

The Privacy Problem

You can't afford public dating failures. Your professional reputation matters. Your family has expectations. Your community is watching. The stakes of being seen, of being vulnerable, of trying and failing publicly—they're too high.

So you don't try. Or you try privately, quietly, in ways that feel safe but also feel limiting.

This is the success tax no one talks about: the erosion of ordinary ways to meet people, trust people, and love people.

The Wrong Solutions (And Why They Fail)

"Just be more vulnerable"
​This is the advice of people who don't understand the stakes. When vulnerability has professional consequences—when showing uncertainty could undermine your authority, when admitting loneliness could be weaponized—"just be vulnerable" isn't helpful. It's naive.

"Date within your circle"
​The problem is, your circle is increasingly narrow. And dating within it creates its own complications: professional conflicts of interest, social fallout if it doesn't work, the impossibility of starting fresh when everyone knows your history.

"Lower your standards"
​This implies the problem is pickiness. It's not. The problem is structural: the environments where successful people spend time aren't designed for authentic connection. Being less selective doesn't solve that—it just leads to more disappointing dates with people you're fundamentally incompatible with.

"Work on yourself first"
​You've done the therapy, you've read the books, you've hired the coach. You're not broken. The problem isn't internal readiness—it's that the external infrastructure for meeting compatible people has collapsed.

Redesigning Connection

The care/of method isn't just about finding someone—it's about finding someone aligned enough that you can dare to be vulnerable, because the framework we’ve created will protect your privacy.

We start with the recognition that your challenges are structural, not personal. That privacy enables authenticity. That depth requires time. That the right match isn't about credentials—it's about character, values, and trajectory.

We match on what matters: how you think, what you value, where you're going—not what you've achieved or what's on your résumé.

If you've done everything "right" and still feel the undertow of isolation, you're in exactly the right place to recalibrate.

Because when everyone else is playing volume, you can choose depth. When everybody else is offering a bio, you can offer presence. When the marketplace treats connection like a commodity, you can treat it like a craft.

Freedom isn't doing everything yourself—it's finding the people with whom you can finally stop performing.